
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
- 1109 Geddes Avenue Ann Arbor, MI 48109
- (734) 764-1817
- Visit website
- Retention rate: 98%
- Programs offered: 206
Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard
BestOnlineCollege.org is an advertising-supported website. Many of the school and program listings that appear on this site are from partners who compensate us, and this compensation may affect how, where, and in what order listings appear (such as featured placements). This compensation does not influence our editorial content, evaluations, or rankings, which are determined independently using publicly available data. We do not review or feature every school or program available in the marketplace. Our goal is to provide accurate, unbiased information so you can make informed decisions. Read our full Advertiser Disclosure.
Online industrial design degrees use asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid, and low-residency formats, and the format has to solve two problems that most online degrees do not have. The first is studio critique: a group of people looking at unfinished work together and arguing about it. The second is making: foam, board, prints, finishes, and the physical model you can hold. Sketching, CAD, and rendering move online almost without loss. Critique moves online well when it is structured and badly when it is a comment box. Physical making is where programs genuinely differ, and it is the question to press hardest before you enroll.
This page explains the common online formats for industrial design programs, how studio and shop work are handled at a distance, and how format affects the portfolio you graduate with.
Programs commonly use asynchronous, synchronous, hybrid, and low-residency formats. The format mainly changes how studio critique happens and how physical work is produced and reviewed, not the core academic content.
Usually through scheduled reviews. You post sketches, CAD screenshots, or model photographs on a deadline, and faculty and classmates respond by a second deadline, often with a live video session where work is shared on screen. The programs that work well use structured critique against project criteria. The ones that do not turn studio into an upload folder with comments underneath.
Approaches vary. Some programs ship materials kits. Some require local access to a makerspace, community college shop, or public library fabrication lab. Some ask students to buy a small 3D printer or basic hand tools. Some run short on-campus residencies for shop-intensive work. Ask which of these applies before you enroll, and price it.
Typically a parametric or surface modeler such as SolidWorks, Rhino, Fusion 360, or Alias, a rendering tool such as KeyShot, and Adobe applications for presentation and portfolio work. Some programs teach sketching on a drawing tablet. Ask which licenses the school provides and what computer specification it assumes, because rendering and large assemblies are hardware-hungry.
Time commitment varies by course load and school. Studio courses tend to consume more hours than their credit count suggests, because iteration expands and physical work has drying, printing, and shipping time built in. Ask each school for a sample studio week.
For a full overview of program options, start with the Industrial Design Program Guide.
Every school list on this site is ordered by the BOC Score, computed from the most recent school-level data published by the U.S. Department of Education (College Scorecard and IPEDS). To qualify, a school must be currently operating and accredited by an agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. Each eligible school is then scored on five measures, percentile-ranked against schools at the same credential level:
Schools without enough outcome data appear after ranked schools, without a score. Advertising never affects these rankings. Read the full methodology.

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard

Source:IPEDSCollege Scorecard
Asynchronous courses let students access materials and complete work on their own schedule within a defined timeframe.
This format suits the solitary half of design work: drawing, modeling, and building. Recorded software demonstrations are genuinely better than a live classroom for CAD, because you can pause and rewind a modeling sequence. The tradeoff is that when a critique comment is unclear, resolving it costs a round trip instead of a question asked while looking at the object.
Synchronous courses are built around scheduled live sessions.
Live review is where studio culture actually lives. Watching an experienced designer talk through why a surface transition is wrong, in sequence, while pointing at it, teaches judgment that written comments compress out. Screen-shared CAD review has a real advantage over a campus pin-up: everyone sees the model at the same resolution, and it can be rotated. The constraint is time zones, and a program that meets live in only one window will exclude some working students.
Hybrid formats combine asynchronous coursework with periodic live sessions. Low-residency programs go further, concentrating shop-intensive and critique-intensive work into short on-campus periods.
For this discipline, low residency is often the honest solution rather than a compromise. A week in a shop with a vacuum former, a CNC router, and a spray booth is not reproducible in a spare room. If travel is a constraint, confirm residency requirements before treating a program as fully remote.
This is the question that separates programs. Ask each school directly:
There is no single right answer. A program that requires local shop access is honest about the constraint but excludes students without one nearby. A program built around shipped kits is more accessible but limits scale and materials. A program that quietly replaces models with renderings is the one to worry about, because handling a form is how designers discover that a shape they liked on screen is uncomfortable in a hand.
Ask which licenses the school provides. This varies, and it affects cost – see Affordable Online Industrial Design Degrees.
Studio workload is uneven by nature. Research weeks are lighter than model weeks. A print that fails on Saturday night costs the whole weekend. Revision expands once critique arrives. The format determines how much slack exists when a project resists.
Pacing interacts with format. Compare: Accelerated Industrial Design Programs
| Feature | Asynchronous | Synchronous | Low-residency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule flexibility | High | Low | Medium between residencies |
| Live critique | None or occasional | Required | Intensive, periodic |
| Shop access | Your own or local | Your own or local | Full shop during residency |
| Feedback | Written or recorded | Live discussion of work | Both, concentrated at residency |
| Best for | Working students with a workspace | Students who learn from live critique | Students who can travel for short intensives |
Online design students typically have access to academic and technical support, though quality varies more than availability.
Ask specifically whether portfolio review and internship support are available to online students on the same terms as campus students. In a field where hiring runs on the portfolio, that service is part of the product.
A good format choice depends on your schedule, your workspace, and how you take critique.
If you already have a workspace and self-direct well, asynchronous or low-residency at standard pace is usually efficient. If you are building design judgment from scratch, live critique is worth the scheduling constraint. For a broader discussion of value and outcomes, see: Is an Online Industrial Design Degree Worth It
Data verified: September 5, 2026. Salary, employment, and tuition figures on this page are sourced from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS May 2025; Employment Projections 2024โ2034) and the U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (2023 cohort). The source agency and data year are cited inline with every statistic.